The following is a response to a forum post at Nerdramblingz, but also to news that Ben “Yahtzee” Croshaw is trying to get a tv-show(as if there isn’t enough pretentious garbage on television already). I know I’m repeating myself here, I’ve said most if not all of this before. Just a friendly reminder why I think he’s the worst thing to happen to video game criticism since IGN.
“As for Yahtzee’s videos, I’ve found just about every one of them about a game I’ve played to be pretty much spot on, for instance that Sonic the Hedgehog is a dead fucking horse, No More Heroes is a game with many flaws but definately worth getting, and the Legend of Zelda could do with some new fucking material. It strikes me that if Yahtzee’s videos cause you to rage, you’re either easily trolled or hip-deep in denial about how awesome a given game is, and chances are it probably sucks on some level or other. Even so, letting your rage blind you to valid points makes you as bad as every retard with a keyboard sending him hate-mail about how he didn’t talk about how X game was the most awesome thing since awesome came to town and that it’s most certainly an awesome game and that he’s a fuckwad.”
Yes, because surely anyone who disagrees with him MUST just be a petty, easily-riled internet-fag, in denial about the “truth” of a game’s quality. That’s a convenient philosophy; one that means you never, ever have to consider the notion that not everyone of passing intelligence thinks Ben Croshaw is the leading authority on video games. Contrary to popular belief, not everyone who dislikes his reviews is an illiterate twat, incapable of overruling emotional response with sound, articulate reasoning.
I don’t like his reviews. Not because he disagrees with me on some of the games he has weird vendettas against(to this day I still don’t know what his bias is towards Nintendo games, which he’s admitted to having on several occasions). He’s certainly allowed to not like the things I like, and vice-versa. But he tends to choose the most inconsequential non-problems as validation for slinging mud in any given title’s direction. Especially when there are plenty of valid excuses to hate some of the games he reviles, which he doesn’t often explore. And when he does find a flaw with a game that is a valid annoyance, he makes it out to be a self-destructive, experience-killing fault, and responds to it as if the game stole his parking space.
I don’t know. Isn’t there enough crap on TV?
His Smash Bros. Brawl review, for example, is one of the worst things currently on the internet. His main argument for this game’s lack of worth boils down to the fact that he had trouble telling what was going on(I’m still not sure how that’s even possible, given the plethora of options the game allows you to make things much less hectic, and more like a traditional fighting game), and because you have to unlock stuff. In a fighting game.
Those bastards.
And to show that he’s not above making shit up just to back up his imaginary arguments, he’ll say something like how “all of the levels in the Adventure Mode are the same”. Which they are not. I would know. I’ve actually spent more than 2 hours with this game. I’ve beaten it several times. If the levels were all the same, or even -similar-, I’d have noticed, and I would agree with him on that. But they’re NOT, which makes him either a liar or ignorant, either of which makes his opinions on the matter worth as much as dog shit.
And even if he presented a well thought-out argument(he didn’t), there’s PLENTY of things wrong with that game that he never touches. The awful Classic mode. The strange character roster(aside from mentioning that he doesn’t know who Marth is, and how Nintendo is the devil for not localizing Mother 3). The shitty online mode. The lackluster user-content. The fact that it latched on to the Achievements and Trophy mentality of PS3 and Xbox 360 games, while not learning from their mistakes(some of the Challenges are just impossible to expect from the audience, like beating the Boss Battle mode on Intense, or getting every last randomly generated sticker). The unusually steep difficulty curve of the Adventure Mode, right up to the asshole of a Final Boss(don’t even get me started on the Giant Diddy Kong battle).
Then there’s his bashing of games like Bioshock for being too “simplistic” and “easy” compared to PC games of its ilk, as if those were bad things that ruin the experience. And I don’t recall him really going into depth about the atmosphere or the story it sets up. He’s so pre-determined to find fault with everything, he almost never has the time or motivation to acknowledge when a game does something right. That’s the thing nobody ever mentions when they sing tales of this marvelous new reviewer. Unless it’s Psychonauts or Silent Hill 2, he doesn’t really go to great lengths to explain the things today’s video games do pull off successfully. That would mean being a credible, level-headed critic, and that’s SO overrated, you guys.
And then there’s the hypocrisy. It’s hard to find a video review by him where he doesn’t consider a game the equivalent of feces just for having the audacity to put in Quicktime-Events(which really aren’t as detrimental to games as people make them out to be). But that won’t stop him from giving a review bordering on fellatio to God of War: Chains of Olympus, which started that trend in the first place, and doesn’t even do Quicktime events in a commendable or entertaining manner in the first place.
Or JRPGS! Yes, surely they are all terrible, idiotic wastes of your time and money… He won’t say WHY, but let’s all believe everything he says because he knows how to use Google’s Image Search in a humorous way LOL
And to top it all off, he presents these bits of insanity in a near-unintelligible manner. I think the reason his videos get so many hits may be because he makes it impossible to fully grasp what he’s saying the first two or three times, not just because he has a Fanboytallion of people willing to let him make all of their opinions for them. So even if he does say something that I could ever agree with, or would make sense in a rational universe(I’m glad I’m not the only one who thinks the Metal Gear series isn’t God’s gift to mankind), it’s kind of rendered moot when I can’t understand what the fuck he’s saying, since he decided to adopt the speaking style of a ranting auctioneer.
If you pay attention, it does seem like he puts some real effort into what he chooses to say to his audience, but it’s hard to figure out precisely WHAT he’s rambling about. His speech in Zero Punctuation reviews is slurred and tripping over itself in the rush to get to the next insult for people who like Guitar Hero. This isn’t because he has an Australian accent either. It’s because he tries to cram too much into a single spoken sentence, without taking the time to actually say what he’s trying to say. He might very well be a clever person, but his presentation is lousy.
(His blog is a lot better for this, actually, since he doesn’t make the font-size really, really tiny and for that matter he chose a font and layout that isn’t confusing.)
To summarize:
- -He hates games for minor flaws nobody else gives a shit about
- -He’s known to pull fictional nonsense out of his ass to use against a given game
- -He consistently reveals himself to be a self-contradicting boob
- -He tends to spend more time criticizing the point than the execution. If movies aren’t “what they’re about, but HOW they’re about”, then why should video games be any different?
- -And he doesn’t understand that trying to spew out all of his rants all at once, in record-time, without pausing between sentences isn’t the way to go about getting a point across.
And people love him for this. Actually, people love him because he’s funny, which they tend to confuse with “wise”. Yes, he’s funny. Yes, his little power-point presentations can elicit a laugh even from someone as jaded as myself. That doesn’t excuse him for being a shitty reviewer, whose standards for quality operate on the rules of some backwards-galaxy.
I’m glad someone is achieving popularity without having to compromise his opinions, but I don’t think he’s the right person to be considered a champion of video game criticism(which, sadly, is actually the level of praise he receives). There are much better people for that. I think those of us who don’t swallow Ben Croshaw’s bullshit on a daily basis are right to question whether anyone should. He’s shown time and again that he’s a terrible source for an informed opinion. “He’s the Ann Coulter of video game critics.”
Shamus Young said of him:
“…he’s the most well-known game reviewer out there. This is not an accident.“
He’s right. It’s also no accident that Bill O’Reilly is one of the most recognized pundits in America.
Oh well. At least he doesn’t assign a stupid, pointless numeric to the end of every review. And I can’t help but think that if I had to pay the same prices for video games as Australians do, I’d be even more of an irrational bitch about them myself.
END OF LINE
~A.H.