The following is a comment I submitted to Roger Ebert’s blog. Yes, he brought up VIDJYA GAYMEZ again, but I was in for a surprise.
What did I think to gain from writing this? I doubt he’d read it, or approve it to be posted in the comments of his blog for others to read it. I don’t think that speaks ill of him. I’m sure the majority of comments he gets can make my point, as well as better, more “on-topic” points that I have not.
I’d like to think this might give him a bit of education of what it’s like to be someone who believes Games can be Art, but also understands that very few games even attempt to be entertainment. And fewer still can be called art.
Why should I care?
There were respected, possibly talented stage critics at the time of the introduction of film into the mass culture. They took one look at it, didn’t understand it and made hilariously narrow-minded quotes which remain their only living evidence that they ever existed.
All of their work, much of it probably very good, erased from time. The only thing remaining to represent all they contributed was their public failing. Their great moments of shame.
I don’t want that to happen to a man whose writing has had such a positive influence on who I am, and who I want to be. Years from now, I want him to be remembered as a smart, sensible man who used his line of work to inspire others to be better educated, more thoughtful, more open to new things, new people and new ideas. I don’t want one of my heroes to be remembered only for the one subject for which he was primarily hogshit insane.
Below is the comment I wrote to him:
Read the rest of this entry »